In search engine optimisation, it is a crucial
element to select the right keywords when optimising a website. The
obvious reason being, if you have keywords with no search volume, you
will not receive any traffic. Secondly, if you have keywords that are
too competitive, you will find it very difficult (almost impossible) to
win high ranks. So how do we find the in between balance for both
obstacles? This is where keyword tools would come into place, but how
accurate are they?
To start, the main keyword research tools that are
found on the market today are Wordtracker, Overture Keyword Tool and
Trellian Keyword Discovery. Now I bet many of you are pulling your hair
out over which keywords are going to be suitable for optimisation. What
makes it probably even more stressful is the varying results between
the three different keyword tools i.e. one keyword tool may show a
particular keyword to be very good, while another tool may suggest a
whole different result for the same keyword. Well stop stressing right
now! The truth is that we don't really know how accurate these keyword
tools are and we should only use their search volume figures as an
indication as to whether a keyword is popular amongst search engine
users.
Let's say a keyword phrase, "dog products", has a
search volume of 5,000 searches per month on the Overture Keyword Tool.
To make an assumption that "dog products" is a good keyword for
optimisation, based ONLY on the Overture figure, would be a very bad
assumption. However, it gives us a rough idea of the search volume for
that particular keyword. The next step would be to use Wordtracker or
Keyword Discovery to see if a similar amount of search volume is
present for "dog products" (remember to convert searches for each tool
to a common time frame i.e. monthly or daily). If we have a very low
search volume in BOTH Wordtracker and Keyword Discovery, then I would
be very skeptical about using "dog products" for optimisation. The
whole idea is to get at least two of the three keyword tools to reflect
reasonable / high search volumes before considering that keyword to be
suitable for optimisation. If you have all three keyword tools
returning reasonable / high search volumes for "dog products", then the
chances are that this keyword is reasonable / high in search volume and
definitely worth considering for optimisation.
Once a good set of keywords have been agreed upon
through the use of the keyword tools, you should then focus on the
keywords that have a low / reasonable amount of competing web pages.
There is no point trying to compete for a keyword that has 1,000,000
web pages in competition for it. If you are good at SEO then you could
achieve high ranks for that keyword, but it would require a lot of time
and investment which could be spent on better things. The lower the
competition is, then the more chance of achieving higher ranks.
To recap, there is no indication to say that
keyword tools are 100% accurate. Whilst the reseller of the tool may
suggest otherwise, I highly doubt it. The results should be taken like
a "grain of salt" as they are only useful to give you an idea as to
what the search volume might be like for a particular keyword (high,
moderate or low). With each tool obtaining its results using different
algorithms, in some cases their results will not support each other.
Provided you use two of the keyword tools to investigate the search
volume for keywords, you should be able to make a good decision as to
whether a keyword might be worth optimising for. With that in mind, it
would also be wise to use your common sense to determine if a keyword
is one that YOU would actually use in a search. Otherwise, what would
be the point of optimisation in the first place?
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/seo-articles/search-engine-
optimisation-how-accurate-are-keyword-tools-37940.html
About the Author
David Touri works for SEO Sydney, providing search
engine placement services. He is currently working on the
Adult Match Maker adult
dating services website and Aussie Match Maker adult date
website.
|